|
Pwy yw Iesu? Ymunwch a ni ar Daith Ffydd
Who is Jesus? Join
Our Journey of Faith |
|
Who Do You Say Jesus Is? |
 |
|
Perhaps you can recall such times in your life when a best friend
asks: “So, is she your girlfriend or what?” Or your mother forcing
the issue by using the parental tactic of asking a question by
making a statement: “So, she’s the one...?” At some point,
relationships get personal—they intrude on our private space and
demand that we answer a fundamental question: “just what does this
person mean to me.” It’s a watershed question in any human
relationship. And once it’s asked, the relationship can never be the
same.
The question forces us to either move deeper in the
relationship or become more distant. It forces us to search our
heart, mind, and soul and decide who the other person is. A mere
acquaintance? Just a friend or buddy? A best friend even? A soul
mate? A potential life partner?
|
|
Why Did
Jesus Die? |
 |
|
The idea that the death of Christ deals with the
problem of human sin and brings people into
fellowship with God is one of the central ideas
of the New Testament. An appreciation of the
significance of Christ’s death permeates the
very architecture of Pauline thought1, and no
more prominently than in the passage in his
letter to the Romans that is the focus of this
essay. Here Paul weaves together many of the key
threads in the biblical view of salvation. This
intricately argued and awe-inspiring passage
focuses on the way in which God has revealed his
righteousness, making it possible for sinners to
be ‘justified’ before him through faith. Earlier
in the letter Paul sketches out humanity’s
plight: before and outside of Christ, people are
helpless captives of sin and are powerless to do
anything to escape its tyranny (Rom. 1:18-32).
The “But now…” of 3:21 signals the transition
from the foregoing depressing portrayal of
sinful humanity. |
|
The Da Vinci
Code And All That |
 |
|
Is
Jesus’ life (as recorded in the Gospels), his
ministry, his divinity, after all, only a myth,
and beliefs that the church no longer needs to
hold? Some of the ideas currently in circulation
are reminiscent of some pretty long-standing
historical debates.
The kind of errant
nonsense typified by Dan Brown’s recent
bestseller (racy read though it might be) is
certainly nothing new and needn’t take anybody
by surprise. It has a long and chequered history
dating back to at least the fourth century, and
was felt to be as important - and dangerous -
then, as it is now, for reasons I shall try and
explain.
For an indication
of how important a strong affirmation of Jesus’
divinity was, and still is, we only have to look
at the liturgy we use each Sunday morning in our
service of Holy Communion. |
|
Jesus:
Who Is He? |
 |
|
To read John’s
gospel in the light of the synoptic parallels
reveals noticeable differences between the
writer’s representation of Jesus and that of
Matthew, Mark and Luke. The gospel has been
prized by Christians for its distinctive
portrayal. John characterizes Jesus as the light
of the world (3:19); the way, truth and life
(14:6); the resurrection (11:25); the vine
(15:1); the good shepherd (10:11); and the bread
of life (6:35). He begins his gospel account
with a philosophical statement about the eternal
Word (1:1-18) which has no counterpart in the
synoptic gospels. This has led some commentators
to argue that the writer presents material and
versions of events that have virtually nothing
in common with the synoptic accounts and that
seem irreconcilable with them. Literary style
is an important difference. While the synoptics
make extended use of incidents, parables and
aphorisms, John includes long Christological
discourses. |
|
Jesus of
Contradictions |
 |
|
In comparison with Matthew, Mark and Luke,
John’s gospel (particularly) has been regarded
by some commentators as presenting material that
seems to be contradictory.
Even a cursory examination reveals
that, while the Synoptic Gospels make extended
use of incidents, parables and aphorisms, John
includes long Christological discourses or
meditations. It
is around the identity and significance of
Christ that the question about the nature of the
Fourth Gospel centres.
For example, John begins
his Gospel account with a philosophical
statement about the eternal Word (1:1-18) that
has no counterpart in the Synoptic Gospels.
|
|
|